Clare Curran MP comments on passing the New Zealand Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill
Today Clare Curran MP for the Labour Party wrote in the party's blog Red Alert "No New Zealander can be disconnected from the internet".
Interesting read, but I will reproduce something here for documentation only, just in case one day we can't find that specific page anymore:
There's been an intense reaction to the Bill in social media. I acknowledge, understand and am sympathetic to many of the criticisms and concerns raised by people who are deeply discomforted by having a termination provision in the law even if it is on ice.
The government's bottom line was to have termination in the Bill. Ours was to not support it. The compromise position was to leave it in but require the Minister to put what's called an Order In Council into effect to switch it on. This is very unlikely to happen.
The onus is now on the creative industries to prove there is a case to terminate access and that the notice system is not working. Rather than oppose it outright, we preferred to compromise to ensure New Zealanders are not denied access to the internet.
Account suspension remains in the bill and could theoretically be used in the future, but any Minister who implements termination will have to wear the consequences. It won't be a Labour Minister.
Even more interesting is that at last a politician spells it out clearly and have seen the light:
Evidence before the select committee strongly indicated that sales of music and movies on the internet were going up, not down, and that the industry remains viable and strong, if needing to change the way it distributes material.
Also interesting to see this paragraph:
The fundamental issue here is why so many people illegal downloading and sharing material. This law will hopefulyl have the impact of educating more people who are illegally filesharing and don't understand it is illegal. I would hope that New Zealanders do not condone illegal filesharing.
Why are so many people illegally downloading and sharing copyrighted material? Because the industry is lost and can't come up with new, legal ways of distributing content fast enough. I'm sure if New Zealanders had access to content without the virtual barriers imposed by copyright merchants more would be willing to buy than to copy.
How come users in other countries have access to a larger number of titles through online stores such as Amazon, Apple iTunes, Microsoft Zune and others? Why is that users in other countries have the option to stream content directly to their PCs and multimedia centers through services such as Netflix and Hulu? The answer is commercial interests that create a virtual regional lock on content that want to be free to flow from creators to consumers. Free as in freedom, not free as in gratis.
Those are the same commercial interests that will benefit directly of a law passed by our Parliament, that seemed to have worked against us instead of working with us, by rushing the reading of a copyright bill during a session discussing earthquake-related topics. in the middle of the night.
Other related posts:
Geekzone data analytics with Power BI
Now with more fibre
Unlimited is not unlimited: Vodafone cable going gigabit
comments powered by Disqus