Microsoft ActiveSync 4.2 is the latest synchronization software for Windows Mobile-based devices.
Changes in ActiveSync 4.2 help resolve connectivity related issues with Microsoft Outlook, proxies, partnerships, and connectivity:
- Microsoft Outlook Improvements: Resolves issues relating to error code 85010014
- Proxy/DTPT interaction Improvements: Improved auto configuration of device Connection Manager settings when desktop has no proxy path to the internet.
- Improved Desktop Pass Thru behavior with ISA proxy failures
- Partnership improvements: Better resolution of multiple devices with the same name syncing with the same desktop
- Connectivity Improvements: Better handling of VPN clients (resolve unbinding of protocols from our RNDIS adapter).
- New auto detection of connectivity failure with user diagnostic alerts.
ActiveSync 4.2 supports PC sync via USB cable, Bluetooth, or infrared connection.
If you are using Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition or older, please use ActiveSync 3.8 instead.
There's one company now you can sign up and you can get a movie delivered to your house daily by delivery service. Okay. And currently it comes to your house, it gets put in the mail box when you get home and you change your order but you pay for that, right.
But this service isn't going to go through the interent and what you do is you just go to a place on the internet and you order your movie and guess what you can order ten of them delivered to you and the delivery charge is free.
Ten of them streaming across that internet and what happens to your own personal internet?
I just the other day got, an internet was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday and I just got it yesterday. Why?
Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the internet commercially.
So you want to talk about the consumer? Let's talk about you and me. We use this internet to communicate and we aren't using it for commercial purposes.
We aren't earning anything by going on that internet. Now I'm not saying you have to or you want to discrimnate against those people [...]
The regulatory approach is wrong. Your approach is regulatory in the sense that it says "No one can charge anyone for massively invading this world of the internet". No, I'm not finished. I want people to understand my position, I'm not going to take a lot of time. [?]
They want to deliver vast amounts of information over the internet. And again, the internet is not something you just dump something on. It's not a truck.
It's a series of tubes.
And if you don't understand those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and its going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material.
Now we have a separate Department of Defense internet now, did you know that?
Do you know why?
Because they have to have theirs delivered immediately. They can't afford getting delayed by other people.
Now I think these people are arguing whether they should be able to dump all that stuff on the internet ought to consider if they should develop a system themselves.
Maybe there is a place for a commercial net but it's not using what consumers use every day.
It's not using the messaging service that is essential to small businesses, to our operation of families.
The whole concept is that we should not go into this until someone shows that there is something that has been done that really is a viloation of net neutraility that hits you and me.
Lots of reasons for this, but mainly because I really need stability on a device that is going places with me. As I found out last week in Sydney, the wireless drivers are not stable enough on Windows Vista to allow me to connect to some hotspots, and the new build has some flaws in other areas.
So I decided to give the beta testing a break, resintall a stable OS on this machine and go with this.
Later I will revisit this decision, when we get to a point where the OS is good enough for me to rely on it. Until then, folks, remember this is beta test, so faults are there to be found. Don't use this in production environments and be always prepared to restore your previous OS, as I am doing now.
Good luck to all people testing Windows Vista Beta 2.
Wormy is a new MVP Mobile Devices down under, based in Australia. He is the admin on wormwholecreations, a website dedicated to Windows Mobile, and home of some software support forums, including 1-Pass, XCPUScalar, Tweaks2k2, Battery Pack, IP Dashboard and more.
Laura is a moderator and contributor on Mobility Today.
If you don't know about the Microsoft MVP Awards program, here is a short description:
Microsoft’s Most Valuable Professionals (MVPs) are recognized, credible and accessible individuals with expertise in one or more Microsoft® products who actively participate in online and offline communities to share their knowledge and expertise with other Microsoft customers. Customers want an enriched pool of knowledge and real-life experience to tap for advice and feedback. MVPs are helping to satisfy this need by independently enabling customers in both online and offline technical communities. Customer feedback is vital to product development and R&D. The MVPs represent an important part of this feedback loop by providing another link for Microsoft to listen to the customer.
I am sorry if I missed any new Asian or European MVP Mobile Devices, but I only receive notifications on new USA and Oceania MVPs.
- Using indicators on roundabouts;
- The give way rules;
- Passing another car;
- Using lanes correctly (including on turn).
The following is an interesting and tricky one. It's one of the items in the last item in the list, but most people I see driving around stop the traffic completely, waiting when in fact both vehicles should turn: two vehicles turning into the same road at a laned intersection.
It's incredible how many people in New Zealand do not indicate, or use the wrong indicators when entering roundabouts (no, you don't need to indicate if you are going straight, only when you are getting out of the roundabout, just look at the first picture on the link). Or drive slowly on the highways, just to accelerate when the passing lanes come. Or don't respect give way signs or marks on the streets. Or simply drive in front of cars coming on the main road, without full stop where required.
A June 21 job sheet for police officers in the Central North Island area tells officers to set up road blocks so they can target high volumes of traffic to finish "top group" in their district before the end of the financial year.
Although police have argued for years that motorists were not subject to a quota, the memo was last night seized upon by opposition politicians to attack the Government's credibility.
National's law and order spokesman Simon Power said: "The Government have been telling the public targets do not exist, that this is not a revenue-gathering exercise - but that is obviously not the case."
Act leader Rodney Hide said it made the police look like "just another branch of Inland Revenue". "This just proves what [Prime Minister] Helen Clark and the police have strenuously denied for years - that highway patrols are about government revenue gathering, rather than safer roads."
It is the second case in a month of a memo urging police to issue tickets. In Marlborough, the acting area commander told officers they had to issue two tickets a shift.
Your opinion is important.
We would like to inform you of a change to our spam and anti virus protection policy.
As spam volumes continue to increase, the percentage of incoming email that is classified as spam is also increasing. To address this issue, paradise.net will be deleting spam automatically from your mailbox.
From 29th of June, all email we classify as SPAM will be automatically deleted. This change will mean that you won't be using your mailbox quota as quickly. This change is made at paradise.net and you do not need to do anything.
"As spam volumes continues to increase, the percentage of incoming email that is classified as spam is also increasing" surely is meant to be "As email volumes continues to increase...".
But the thing that worries me is false positives. All those Trademe e-mails, and I've seen a few going into the spam folder, which is only available through their webmail interface, leaving a lot of people without knowing what's going on.
On the bright side, I've noticed that their filters are generally good, but there are always false positives - as a lot of false negatives, since spammers are getting smarter.
No, I don't know the answer, but simply deleting the e-mails without passing them on to the users might cause some problems, unless the filters are better.
Perhaps the solution is better policies, sender authentication (no, not charging for e-mails as AOL wants to do) or some sort of certificate. But not too overly complicated as those spam blocking services that ask you to visit a webpage to enter a code for each e-mail you send to a friend - I stopped authenticating ages ago, I don't need to waste my time with that.
And blocking smtp ports is not the solution either, as Xtra did a few months ago. There are good legitimate reasons why people use this, and ISPs shouldn't "break" the Internet protocols.
This is a list of what's new on Internet Explorer Beta 3
- Add the e-mail button back to the toolbar
- Reorder web page tabs by dragging them left or right
- Scroll horizontally while zooming
- Incorporate all your RSS feeds automatically
- Mark your RSS feeds as "read"
- Find improved compatibility with websites and web applications
- Improved layout rendering and reliability
- Includes all security fixes in the June Internet Explorer Security Bulletin MS06-021
Ok, reading through the whole blog post it's clear that it was an application driver, but one comment is quite real: we shouldn't see this kind of problems on embedded applications.
A larger photo is available on flickr.
"What this means in effect is that the Bill is sending a strong public policy signal to Telecom and to Vodafone that they will be subject to a greater degree of government regulation."
"Hautaki, Saturn, Econet Wireless ltd, ACN, Kwiknet, netsurf, splurge, surfnet, slingshot, supra networks, actrix, raide internet, clear and Telstraclear, wave, ihug, woosh, xtra, paradise, wireless country….and that’s probably just a start."
Saturn? Econet? "clear and Telstraclear"? xtra? He mixed old stuff, Telecom companies, stuff that is not even in the air yet..
"Why does it cost exactly the same in real terms to make a voice call from my office here in Parliament to my Wellington home- as it does to make a call to my home in Ngongotaha -that’s Rotorua for those who don’t know- and yet I am being charged extra, relative to the physical distance (and yet there is no electronic distance involved). The ability to be well-connected now means far more than the quality of your social networks, as perhaps it did in previous generations."
Because of the Government imposed Kiwi Share?
"People living in Pasifika families have the lowest levels of telephone and internet access in the home (88 and 16 percent respectively) followed closely by people living in Maori families (92 and 28 percent)."
Could that be because these segments are the ones in the lower income bracket?
"Sole parent families are half as likely as two parent families to have internet access (25% compared to 50 percent)."
Could it be because Internet is not the priority, and feeding the family is?
"This is particularly urgent for tangata whenua, as our Maori spectrum interests are associated with mobile. Until the mobile issues are sorted, tangata whenua access to the tele-communications industry and the three billion dollar mobile market is restricted."
Could it be because the spectrum is being "used" by Econet, with no outcome or service yet? If you don't know, Econet is planning to build a third cellular network in New Zealand. The company is owned by Zimbabwe-based Econet, and managed to get hold of some cheap 3G spectrum thanks to a deal with the Maori Spectrum Trust. The company also got a $5 million dollars grant from the government, but so far the new network has not been seen.
You can read more about Econet in this interesting article, from 2005 when the company's boss says "None of the other operators have built [third generation] networks yet but we're the ones who've been kicked around for not building one. We've almost been treated like criminals."
This has been building up since 2000. Six years is a long time to build a new network.
"They take infra-red photos of each other while I’m still searching for the on-off button."
Infrared photos? With a mobile phone?
"At least I’m one ahead of one of my co-leaders, who calls his new-age phone his raspberry."
Now, this is a good punch...
And a discussion is going on in our Geekzone Forums.