John Cleese explains the difference between those two sports, in an excerpt from The Art of Football...
For example 83% of European households have a mobile handsets, but only 56% access the Internet regularly. Also 33% of European citizens have no Internet access (which I assume refers to landline Internet connections).
So what's the solution? "[Vodafone] have the potential to deliver the digital revolution to 500 million European citizens".
The interesting thing here is that Europe is probably the second biggest battleground (after China and India) in the mobile competition. Vodafone is up against O2, T-Mobile, Telefonica of Spain, all fighting for a share of those 500,000,000 customers.
What I would like to see though is what is Vodafone New Zealand's take on this aspect? Competition here is not as strong as in Europe. Does it make it less likely we could see such initiatives, or see price drops coming from the local operators?
Any insight you want to share in comments?
A friend of mine sent an email asking to point my readers to a survey on SMB purchasing habits. If you could answer that, it should take only a couple of minutes...
"... We have reason to believe that SMB owners/decision-makers act much more like consumers in their choice of the online information resources that subsequently affect their purchasing decisions. Further, we want to expose important new insights into how SMBs' habits differ from those of general consumers, defining and understanding them better. The expected outcome is to help ourselves, our clients and you create more effective marketing campaigns targeted at SMBs, and also to boost your value as a blogger by providing evidence of your influence on this critical segment. "
They are aiming for a minimum of 400 complete responses. And respondents fully completing the survey and providing a valid email address will be eligible for a prize. Seeing they expect to close the survey at 400 complete entries, there's a good chance to win something.
The prizes are:
1. Grand prize: One Lenovo A70z all-in-one PC
2. Second prize: Five prize packages, each containing one of each of the following three devices:
o One LG Bluetooth headset (HBM-210)
o One LG Bluetooth stereo headset (HBS-250)
o One LG Bluetooth Solar Car Kit & Emergency Charger (HFB-500)
I am told email addresses will only be used to contact eligible winners and WILL NOT be retained once prize selection has occurred. Contact data will not be shared, neither any respondent will be contacted as a result of this survey.
The link for the survey is http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/SMB_purchase_decision-making. Have in mind this is a U.S.-based survey when answering any questions regarding money (which are optional anyway).
Prizes are valid worldwide... Good luck!
Earlier today I was informed by ICONZ that our IPv6 addresses have been added to their firewall and routing configuration.
I have now added DNS information that allow users to visit Geekzone through an IPv6 connection. We decided to keep it simple and continue to use the current www.geekzone.co.nz URL for both IPv4 and IPv6 connections.
If you visit Geekzone through an IPv6 connection (native or tunnel) then you should see this logo:
If you want to make sure your connection can "see" our server, visit http://ipv6.geekzone.co.nz/ and the default page will show your IPv6 address. The ipv6.geekzone.co.nz test server does not accept connections from IPv4 addresses and it's only a test page.
Also note, this is probably one of the first New Zealand sites in the top online properties to go IPv6.
One of the best geek jokes I've seen...
Today we found out Telecom New Zealand settled in a misleading broadband advertising case. This paragraph caught my eye:
"Telecom has also agreed to pay $75,000 to Consumer New Zealand Inc to assist in the funding of a telecommunications Price Comparison Project which is intended to provide an internet-based tool for consumers to compare the prices of different telecommunications products."
Wow! $75,000 is a lot of money.
Telecom, may I suggest instead you hand this money (or a good chunk of it) to James (Geekzone manhinli, Twitter @manhinli) a student who single-handledly (ok, with the help of a few other Geekzone users I know) has created New Zealand connections, a website that is (using your own words, Telecom) an internet-based tool for consumers to compare the prices of different telecommunications products.
I suspect he would be more than happy with some of this money, plus perhaps some hosting in a good datacentre, and links from your main corporate site. He could even spend more time in improving the awesome New Zealand Broadband Plan Finder page with all this.
Telecom, do the right thing. Consumer New Zealand is good, but there's someone out there who would do much better. I know. And you would be giving a young developer well deserved recognition.
PS. I have the impression Consumer New Zealand won't like me after this post.
It's incredible but TelstraClear does it again. Looking at their status page I see this:
But right now many sites such as Bing.com and Xero.com (both distributed through Akamai), plus Amazon AWS and others are unreachable through TelstraClear's network. Why would that be? TelstraClear tells me everything is fine!
Wait a minute... Look at the events pages at Xtreme Networks and you can read:
"TelstraClear DoS Attacks
Date: 26 May 10 16:13 - 27 May 10 00:00
Affected services: Cable, CityLink, Wireless, DSL, Hosted, E-Mail
Over the last week TelstraClear has been the target of DoS attacks coming out of the Asia region which in turn, affects all TelstraClear international traffic. When we become aware that an attack has commenced we are dropping our TelstraClear international BGP advertisements which forces all international traffic (after BGP advertisement propagation) through our Telecom international circuit. TelstraClear are keeping us up to date regarding mitigating the effects."
Why is it so hard for TelstraClear to come clean and provide information to its customers?
It seems all my latest posts are about TelstraClear, New Zealand's second large ISP, previously voted "Best ISP" on Netguide People's Choice Web Awards (and asking for votes again, which I think will be difficult to win this year). But really TelstraClear seems to be making all the right moves to annoy its users. And I am one of them.
And TelstraClear is not a cheap ISP compared to others (I pay $149 a month plus the occasional excess use for their 80GB/month plan). Premium costs should provide premium service. And with that premium responsibility.
I have been with TelstraClear for more than ten years, way before it was TelstraClear. The cable service was called Saturn, and even before that it was Chello.
I always told everyone TesltraClear had the most reliable, consistently fast service in the country, but in the last nine months things are going downhill from where I see it.
I will try to look at some of the latest developments here, and it's going to be a longer post than usual (well, not when it comes to this topic).
First, there was their YouTube problem, which dragged for more than nine months, until they decided that yes, it was time to deploy a Google cache. I won't go into much details - read my previous posts on TelstraClear YouTube problem.
So now we have a Google cache deployed on TelstraClear. Things are looking a bit better but I am to be convinced they did provision an adequate sized cache. But that was a positive move.
It's a good move, and I believe they did well, seeing Google's policy seems to be to get as much free bandwidth as possible, by having large ISPs putting their caches, bringing content closer to consumers, but also guaranteeing Google an advantage in terms of content distribution at low cost.
This brings me to the next problem. For a few weeks now I have read lots of complaints about TelstraClear slow international traffic. I have experienced this myself. Every single day. It seems the YouTube problem was solved, but another one came to fill the vacuum created.
TelstraClear uses a transparent proxy. It means when we customers connect to a website we are actually connecting to their server, which in turn will cache the content to make it available later to other users requesting it again.
This works great, if the transparent proxy is actually transparent and doesn't show its ugly head to the users. Every now and them (it seems it's always in the morning) websites stop loading, or won't load completely. It always comes right after an hour or couple of hours. I wonder if the transparent proxy is being overloaded and something needs to be done there?
Then there's the international traffic in general. It looks like TelstraClear international pipe is being saturated. For example iTunes movie downloads that used to take 30 - 45 minutes to download now take 4 - 6 hours. Access to content hosted at Amazon services (such as Amazon AWS storage, used by many companies to distribute images for example) has been slow or simply not connecting at all. Twitter avatars for example.
TelstraClear doesn't "peer" in New Zealand with smaller ISPs. This means they don't exchange some of this traffic locally, with some of this local traffic on TelstraClear's network going overseas and then back into New Zealnd just to reach a server on another side of town.
Always wondered why using www.speedtest.net from Wellington and testing against the Wellington server gives you bad results? Because of this "international traffic". Look at these results (I am based in Wellington):
Try using one of the CityLink servers to download a Linux install file and see how slow that goes... And they are just around the corner (so to speak) from here!
Now, don't take my word, but that's what I think anyway - and I am not sure we will ever hear a confirmation from TelstraClear, but I think Google requires dedicated bandwidth for their cache. And TelstraClear forces a lot of "local" traffic over international links. It could be that international bandwidth has now some reserved bandwidth used by the new Google cache, without any additional bandwidth being provisioned for the existing use.
This comes also with a rumour I heard about TelstraClear having some problems with one of its providers of international traffic, Reach, which just happens to be a sister company, also owned by Australian telco Telstra.
TelstraClear promises to be deploying DOCSIS3 anytime now (which in TelstraClear terms means "in the next five years), but what good would it be for users, if the rest of the structure doesn't support higher speeds?