The only outstanding point in the whole project was security certification. Back then I asked Microsoft Australia, Microsoft New Zealand, Microsoft Corp and my Windows Mobile MVP peers for any information on this.
I came out with no answers. I knew there was something for the U.S. DoD, but couldn't find anything for Australia and New Zealand.
It seems this is now solved, at least in Australia, where the Australian Deparment of Defence, Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) has accredited both Windows Mobile and Blackberry solutions.
I still haven't heard of anything similar here in New Zealand.
The word in our Geekzone forums is that Xtra is changing how it handles e-mail, again. And this page confirms those changes from 18 March.
Hoiw does this change affect you? If you are using Xtra for your e-mails and always send e-mails from an address that ends on @xtra.co.nz then nothing changes.
If you are using Xtra to send e-mails with address that end in something different thn @xtra.co.nz then keep reading.
Whenever someone sends an e-mail, a SMTP server is used to relay the message to other servers for distribution.
In most cases, ISPs allow access to their SMTP servers to users on their own network, or to authenticated users if coming for other networks.
But SMTP servers do not require the "FROM" field in the message to be exactly the user's e-mail address.
This means that once a user successfully authenticate with the SMTP server it is possible to send e-mails as someone else. And this can be a problem. People can just authenticate to a SMTP server and impersonate someone else. Or use it for spam purposes.
To eliminate ths problem Xtra has decided (or was it Yahoo! who decided this?) that a "validation" is required to confirm that the e-mail address you are using to send a message is actually yours.
It's simple to do it, just follow these instructions.
Even though it's simple to do it, I can imagine a lot of people will be caught on this. I just hope their help desk this time is preared to provide people with the correct answers.
The service itselft is nothing new. Microsoft bought Foldershare a couple of year ago and it appears it now shows an updated web user interface and full integration with Windows Live accounts. The PC client has been updated as well - which means fuill Windows Vista support now.
Other than that I wonder if the 10,000 file limit per sync pair is still there. It makes the software unusable for me, because some of my folders have way more than 10,000 files - the documents folder for example, with all the web, images, etc.
To install this on a client PC you will need Windows Vista SP1, and the Internet Information Services 7.0 Management Console installed already installed.
On the server you must have the Management Service configured and running. More instructions here.
The connection is over SSL, and if you are running a VPN and don't allow access through your firewall this should be a safe and quick way to manager IIS. In my case I am using Hamachi (it works great on Windows Server 2008) and I configured the Management Service to accept connections only from my private IP address.
The service streams live TV to mobile devices (no need to visit the site if you are not in the United States, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Peru or Dominican Replublic) and being the provider of such a service you would think they have a secure platform for content delivery.
Or not... Someone posted on HowardForums detailed instructions on to access the service and a direct link to a single file that allows acess to the entire service. The file in question (qtv.mobitv.com/sprintTVlive.mcd) seems now to have been removed, but until this whole thing started it was available to anyone to access it - no authentication, no encryption, nothing.
Basically the trick was to download the file, and using your browser open the local version to then have access to many of the live TV streams offered by Sprint to their customers.
The folks at mobitv didn't like that someone posted detailed instructions on HowardForums about this and sent out a notice. They actually contacted the hosting provider to have the HowardForums taken down.
What's wrong here? First, I agree detailed instructions on how to go around getting free services is a bit too much.
But on the other hand mobitv created a content delivery platfotm that would not guarantee access to members only, apparently lacking authentication, encryption and possibly more.
C'mon guys, sharpen up. If you create a service, make it right. Don't plan on putting the locks after the doors are wide open. You should have done this before. You have your system fixed, Be sure to create better system next time.
As for HowardForums, leave the forum alone. For what I read it's wasn't even posted there first, because the poster says this was found in another Sprint forum somewhere else on the Internet.
This is wrong, very wrong, and David Farrar says it why:
It is one thing to have a law which requires telcos to record the content of text messages *after they receive a search warrant targetted at a particular individual. But this is about having the telcos store every single text message we send or receive, so it can then be accessed.
The precedent this would set is that ISPs should also keep a copy of every e-mail message you ever send or receive, in case the Police should ever want it. And then how about also requiring them to keep track of every website you have ever visited.
Telcos and ISPs should co-operate with the Police *after* a warrant has been served requiring interception or recording of data which a Judge/JP has authorised as necessary for a criminal investigation. But that is very different to having them forced to store personal communications on every NZer, so that law enforcement authorities can access them at some later date if they wish. Why not also have the teclso [sic] record every voice call, just in case they are also needed?
The New Zealand government should not propose this, and this should not be allowed.
Anyway, last night I decided to install the software and see how it performs. First I downloaded their latest version to make sure all would be ok.
WindowBlinds comes with a few skins, but you can download more from their site. Some are free, some are premium. One of the default ones that come with the software is quite cool anyway and I am using it to demo the animation effects in the following video:
One of the themes makes my Windows Vista laptop look completely like a Mac OS X machine, except that minimise works on Windows.
This will modify the most common elements on your desktop - the themes. This includes buttons, scroll bars, fonts, the Windows Orb, taskbar, etc.
I did not notice any performance impact on my laptop with those modifications.
If you want to go a step further you can use other software from Stardock to customise the experience even more, including icons, a full taskbar replacement, etc.
I found only one program didn't work quite well with WindowBlinds, and that was SnagIt, for screen capture. SnagIt would crash every time I right-clicked its icon in the system tray - the only program to do this. So now I am divided between keeping WindowBlinds and limiting SnagIt usability or remove it from the system and stop having fun.
Now it's official and I can tell: the Open Source content management system (CMS) SilverStripe, developed here in Wellington, was selected by the U.S. Democratic Party as the platform for its pre-election conference, the Democratic National Convention 2008.
The number of broadband subscribers in the six months to September 2007 overtook the number of dial-up subscribers for the first time ever, Statistics New Zealand said today.
Broadband subscribers continued to increase – up 14.4 percent in the six months to September 2007, to reach 829,300. However, this growth rate has slowed from an increase of 28.6 percent in September 2006 and 18.5 percent in March 2007. Subscribers with dial-up connection fell 8.6 percent from March 2007, down to 675,800.
The number of broadband subscribers grew from 9 per 100 inhabitants to 19.6 per 100 inhabitants in the two years ended September 2007, while the number of dial-up subscribers per 100 inhabitants fell from 21.2 to 15.9. Of the additional 10.6 broadband subscribers per 100 inhabitants, half switched from dial-up and the remaining half were new subscribers.
There was a 47 percent increase in the number of Internet service providers reporting that the cost of international bandwidth had been a barrier to growth in the past two years.
Good news. I understand those ISPs who complained of the cost of international bandwitdth as a barrier are right in some points.
But they also have to understand that broadband is not going back, and connections are only likely to go up in numbers. So there's not much they can do about it, except better capacity planning (currently lacking in almost every New Zealand ISP it seems) and apply more realistic prices to their plans.
In the last two years we've seen many examples of ISPs (Xtra, Woosh, Slingshot) who offered "unlimited" broadband plans, only to later realise people do take "unlimited" seriously. Some of these ISPs closed the plans to new customers, applied rate shapping technologies to limit the utilisation ("unlimited"?) or simply denied anything was happening, while constraining resources until users had to cancel their accounts.
It is time for ISPs to stop doing this and be realistic about the services people expect from them.