In it Cringely explains that Net neutrality has been an utopic ideal for some time:
...big broadband ISPs were apparently preparing to offer tiered levels of service and at this point it is a matter of flipping a switch, with the result that Comcast's VoIP might suddenly work a LOT better than Vonage's VoIP, which is to say my fax line.
Well it turns out that I may have, in this case, actually understated the problem. Readers claim that some -- who knows, maybe ALL -- big broadband ISPs are ALREADY running tiered services.
"I used to work at Time-Warner Cable's Road Runner High Speed HQ," wrote one reader, "and as of 2005, TWC marked all VoIP packets with the TOS bit turned to 1. TWC has 5 levels of priority, VoIP having the highest, router tables second, commercial services 3rd, Road Runner consumer 4th and everything else is classified as 'best effort'."
How does it apply to New Zealand? Remember the Xtra Go Large fiasco? That was supposed to be a plan with no limits, full speed, but with "managed" peer to peer (P2P) traffic. What happened is that a lot of people complained, Telecom New Zealand denied anything was wrong, but after a while they conceded the "network management" implementation was crippled and actually ALL traffic was being impacted for users on that plan.
This week I attended the Thirsty Thursday drinks promoted by the IAB and had a chance to chat with Collin Jackson, president of InternetNZ. They are not talking about Net neutrality, but pushing hard for peering. Go read the link. Peering has nothing to do with peer to peer networks, it's a completely different thing, and peering in New Zealand it is a hot topic.
Anyway, keep reading Cringely's piece to find:
What's to be done, then? Well we won't be going back to true net neutrality. Revealing that it had never existed was probably a weapon the ISPs were saving for their final defense of the status quo. In the long run, the ISPs will probably get their way, too, on being paid for access to higher service tiers. But since we've already paid for that bandwidth, I propose the ISPs be made to share their bounty with us.
If an ISP can account for packets on different service levels accurately enough to bill a Google or a Yahoo, then they can take half of the revenue generated by allowing faster access to me and credit that to my account, lowering my bill. I can either take the money and run or apply it toward raising the priority level of some of my own services.
Other related posts:
Microsoft Ignite New Zealand, Microsoft Surface Studio
Geekzone data analytics with Power BI
Now with more fibre
comments powered by Disqus